The contents:
|
|
|
|
|
An over-clocked Pentium II |
In the previous pages you can read about the theory behind over clocking. Here I describe a practical case.
In April 1999 we needed a new workstation. It was to used for graphics work and sometimes video editing, so it had to be speedy. We decided to try some over clocking.
Over clocking with Intel - earlier results |
Intel CPUs have always been good for over clocking.
Back in 1997 we had a Pentium Pro designed for 200 MHz. It ran (and still runs) at 233 MHz without any problem at all.
Later we got one of the first Pentium IIs. These processors were very friendly to over clocking, both the frequency of the system bus as well as the clock factor could be changed. A modest 233 MHz version ran (and still does) at 300 MHz.
The Deschutes kernel of second generation Pentium II and Celeron was changed, so every CPU only could work with a specific clock factor. This means that you only can over-clock by increasing the bus frequency. This has been the situation with all later Intel processors.
You see our over clocking results as described are not extreme. This has a reason; all our PCs function in a network and they are heavily used for various demanding tasks. So they have to be completely stable, which they also have been. Further over clocking would aggravate the inherent un-stability.
The first attempt |
We started up with the cheapest solution. A 300 MHz Celeron should be doing fine at 450 MHz if the system bus was increased from 66 MHz to 100 MHz. We even added extra cooling, a fan placed above the SEC module:
It never worked. But the motherboard was interesting, so we went for another approach.
Pentium II and Abit BX6 |
We then purchased a Pentium II-450 MHz. This processor was the clock factor 4.5 model of the Pentium II you could say.
The motherboard was the newest version (2.0) of the pretty well-known Abit BX6. It is a BX-based board with is capable of delivering a lot of different frequencies. The clock multiplier goes up to factor 8, but since the Pentium II only works with clock factor 4.5, we had these options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course I could not expect my Pentium II to run at 689 MHz. The values are theoretical.
When you increase the bus frequency it affects a lot of units within the PC. This is due to the architecture, where the system bus so to say is a local bus, with other attached buses and units working synchronously. Increasing the bus frequency influences:
Over clocking a PC is not that simple. All the mentioned units have to be tuned, so they work at right frequencies.
Testing and trying |
One of the biggest problems is to control the speed of the PCI units. Our network (LAN) is a very good tool for testing this. I make a backup of all my documents (> 10.000 files) across the network from harddisk to harddisk, and if this works i am pretty sure that everything is all right with the new PC.
With the Pentium II, I started increasing the bus frequency. Of course everything worked fine at 100 MHz. It should. 112 MHz was completely stable. 117 MHz as well, but at 124 MHz the problems came. Here you see the Soft Menu setting, which is an extremely nice feature of the BX6 board:
The PC seemed to work at 558 MHz, but the file copy-test could not be performed. The PC froze. This probably was due to "slow" SDRAM. With better RAM it might have worked.
SDRAM speeds |
Here is an theoretical calculation of the required SDRAM speed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The RAM was of PC100 type. But this may be 10, 8 or 7 ns. In our case it was 8 ns, so the 124 MHz setting should have been working, it just didn't.
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
So we ended up with a completely stable Pentium II system running at 527 MHz. That's absolutely OK.
Features of the Abit BX6 |
The Abit board seems pretty cool to me. The manual is OK but not overwhelming impressive. The board has 5 PCI slots which I like. But especially the Soft Menu II is great - a brilliant tool for over-clockers. You do not have to move a simple jumper on the BX6 board, so it is extremely simple to test your CPU and system at various frequencies.
You also get thermistor to detect the CPU temperature:
It is taped to the heat sink and connected to the motherboard.
You get some software, among others this diagnostic tool:
My realistic guess would be that this configuration using 7 ns SDRAM might work:
|
frequency |
frequency |
speed |
frequency |
|
|
|
|
|
| Learn more |
Read more about the boot process and system bus in Module 2b
Read more about I/O buses in module 2c
Read more about the motherboard chip set in module 2d
Read more about RAM in module 2e
Read about EIDE in module 5b
|
Copyright (c) 1996-2005 by Michael B. Karbo. www.Karbosguide.com.